In recent days, national attention has been drawn to a new policy implemented this spring by the current administration that has resulted in the forcible separation of children from immigrant families. No one needs the opinion of a doctoral-level psychologist to understand that such separations are devastatingly cruel to the families involved. What policy makers are less likely to understand are the pernicious and often life-long effects of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). How will we as a profession respond?
Join us on July 18 at 2 p.m. ET when Dr. Sammons will discuss recent advances in understanding the efficacy of combining pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for depression.
If you missed the live-session webinar, watch now! Dr. Zelechoski reviews the types of requests for information that practitioners may receive for various legal purposes, including subpoenas and court orders.
From the Executive Officer’s Desk—Overcoming the “DSM Fallacy”: Is It Time to Start Crowdsourcing Mental Health Treatments?
It is the nature of scientific inquiry to seek greater specificity in understanding natural phenomena, and our clinical research colleagues strive valiantly to do so. But the scientific method can lead us astray in that it demands a focus on problems, not patients. In this column, I analyze our lack of success in ameliorating the global burden of mental distress and suggest that crowdsourcing, a strategy enabled by widespread electronic communications, might provide a solution towards making effective interventions more widely available.
A recently published database tracking pharmaceutical company donations to not-for-profit associations provides data indicating that industry funding provides significant revenue to patient advocacy groups. Other data suggest that this funding might be intended to create informal lobbying groups that can act on behalf of drug manufacturers. While drug company promotional activities are not newsworthy, the absence of mental health associations from the list of funded groups raises questions about the influence of mental health advocacy.
APA’s Council of Representatives has recently approved a Clinical Practice Guideline for the treatment of PTSD. Arguments for and against the use of clinical practice guidelines have been extensively—even ferociously—debated in psychology. Some point to accrued evidence supporting the use of specific therapies, others fear a devolution to prescriptive, mechanized treatments. Whether pro or con, discussions of guidelines must take into consideration the fact that regardless of the modality employed, effect sizes for mental health interventions are not terribly convincing to begin with. In this column, I’ll examine the new guideline and some of the assumptions underlying it.
National Register signed the Mental Health Liaison Group’s letter supporting the passage of H.R. 2345, The National Suicide Hotline Improvement Act of 2017.
National Register signed the Mental Health Liaison Group’s letter to Veterans Affairs requesting more information on their next steps for implementing the recommendations made from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) new report.
Registrant Helene Satz, PsyD, ABPP, CGP, will be presented the 2018 Harold S. Bernard Group Psychotherapy Training Award by the International Board for Certification of Group Psychotherapists. Congratulations!
The National Register has partnered with Hushmail. Registrants get a 15% lifetime discount on the use of Hushmail for Healthcare, a secure, HIPAA-compliant email service that enables psychologists to send and receive private, encrypted emails and attachments to clients, insurance companies, colleagues and others.
In recent weeks we have heard news that three corporate titans of America, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffet, and Jamie Dimon, have banded together to form a healthcare company that is “free of the profit motive” to serve, at least initially, the hundreds of thousands of individuals employed by Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan Chase. While this may sound a bit surprising coming from three of the most successful capitalists in the world, the idea has merit. Details of the endeavor are understandably lacking, but in the absence of those details we can speculate about what a healthcare system free of a profit motive might look like.
The Winter 2018 issue of our journal is in the mail and should arrive shortly. Featured topics include intimate partner violence, sleep difficulties in children and adolescents, tinnitus management, chronic pain, and detecting and assessing suicide.