Publications
 

field

The Register Report, Fall 2005: A Special Report on Psychopharmacology

Section I: Pursing Prescription Privileges

Legal Update 16: Power To Prescribe:
The Debate Over The Prescription Privilege For Psychologists And The Legal Issues Implicated

by James E. Long, Jr.

Return to Table of Contents


The debate within the field of psychology regarding the right to prescribe psychotropic medication has persisted for the past two decades, with the American Psychological Association (APA) officially considering the matter beginning in 1989.1 Recent studies estimate that over 44 percent of Americans are prescribed at least one drug, and that 16.5 percent take at least three.2 In response to the growing debate, the APA established a task force to evaluate the "desirability and feasibility of psychopharmacology prescription privileges for psychologists."3 The task force proposed three levels of training in psychopharmacology, including recommended focus areas and curriculum requirements: (1) Level One - basic education; (2) Level Two - collaborative practice; and (3) Level Three - prescription privileges.4 The task force concluded that psychologists who provided mental health services should at least have access to level one training, and recognized an evolving "subspecialty of psychology with comprehensive knowledge and experience in psychopharmacology" that has the potential to dramatically improve patient care and treatment.5 In 1995, the APA Council of Representatives formally announced its objective to obtain prescription privileges, and called for the drafting of model legislation and training curriculum.6 The current APA model program for prescription privileges, in addition to completing an accredited doctoral program in professional psychology, requires a minimum of 300 contact hours of didactic instruction and supervised treatment of 100 patients, with no specified minimum length of training time required.7

Despite what appears to be only a slight majority of support from the profession as a whole,8 the APA has largely been successful in spreading its initiative to the states. The cooperation and support of the state legislatures is a necessary requirement for the APA to achieve its goal, since the courts have long recognized the authority and autonomy of the states in regulating health care professionals.9 As of Spring 2002, after New Mexico became the first state to pass legislation enabling psychologists to obtain prescription privileges, state psychological associations in thirty-one states had assembled task forces to lobby their state legislatures to enact similar legislation that would create a special class within the licensed psychologists.10 Most recently, Louisiana became the second state to enact a similar law on May 6, 2004, creating a "medical psychologist" who may prescribe certain medications with the consultation of a primary care provider.11

The first part of this note will compare and contrast the two state statutes, New Mexico and Louisiana, which have enabled psychologists to prescribe certain medications upon completing specific requirements. In addition, the states' basis and purpose for enacting these laws will also be explored. The second part will discuss the debate over the prescription privilege from both sides, as it has evolved over the last twenty years. The third part will discuss the legal implications of a prescription privilege for psychologists, focusing mainly on liability and governmental regulation. continued

page 1



page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Copyright 2005 Council for the National Register of Health Service Providers in Psychology

National Register | 1120 G St NW | Ste 330 | Washington DC 20005 | p: 202.783.7663 | f: 202.347.0550

 

1 1 1 opencube.com